Email: [email protected]
Bio:
Everything you need to know about the latest SMS regulation news — including the FCC’s 2026 consent overhaul, state mini-TCPA laws, 10DLC mandates, and what your business must do to stay compliant.
If you’re running SMS campaigns in the United States, you’re navigating two overlapping compliance frameworks: the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), a federal law enforced by the FCC and through private litigation, and the CTIA Messaging Principles and Best Practices, a set of industry standards enforced by mobile carriers. Breaches of either—or both—put your organization at financial and operational risk.
This guide is for compliance and legal teams, privacy officers, and operations managers responsible for SMS programs. It covers the latest SMS regulation updates, the rules you need to know about, how they apply to different message types, what has changed in recent times, and how to build a program that will stand up to scrutiny.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) is a federal consumer protection law in the United States that was passed to decrease the number of unwanted telemarketing calls and protect consumer privacy. The law was enacted before SMS even existed, but the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) has long interpreted the statute to consider text messages to be “calls” under the TCPA, and thus all SMS and MMS communications are subject to the same core restrictions as voice calls.
The law also pertains to:
The TCPA has been amended many times since it was enacted in 1991, and the pace of regulatory change has accelerated significantly since 2023. If you run an SMS program, staying current on SMS regulation news is no longer optional. The cost of non-compliance is too high to consider compliance as a periodic audit rather than as a continuous operational discipline.
The last 18 months have been the most significant series of SMS regulatory changes since the enactment of the TCPA. So here’s a consolidated summary of what’s changing and when it goes into effect.
Under this rule, businesses must honor opt-out requests made by any reasonable means — not only keyword replies like STOP or QUIT. Opt-outs sent via email, voicemail, written letter, or informal conversational language (i.e., “please stop texting me”) are now legally valid. Such requests shall be processed by businesses within 10 business days, but real-time processing is recognized as the industry best practice and highly recommended to mitigate litigation exposure.
This is the most significant piece of SMS regulation news structurally in years. The FCC’s new one-to-one consent rule closes the “lead-generator loophole” by banning consent from being shared across brands or sold to third parties. Each sender entity shall get affirmative consent directly from each consumer.
This rule has a direct impact on:
In February 2024, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling that, under federal law, voices generated by artificial intelligence are “artificial voices.” This ruling was specifically about voice calls, but the FCC has signaled that the same consent and disclosure requirements would apply to AI-assisted SMS content. If a business is using AI tools to generate, personalize, or optimize SMS messages at scale, those workflows should be captured within its consent and registration framework.
Since February 2025, U.S. carriers have been blocking unregistered A2P SMS traffic sent via 10-digit long codes. For the businesses that had not registered with the Campaign Registry (TCR) for brand and campaign registration by this date, message delivery failures were immediate. Registration is a must-have, not a nice-to-have after you launch, when you’re launching a new SMS program or adding a new use case.
The latest update to CTIA’s Messaging Principles and Best Practices was issued in October 2025. Key changes bolstered requirements regarding URL handling, sender identification, and opt-in language specificity. Carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile use these new standards to score and route A2P traffic.
The FCC enforces the TCPA rules, but the law also allows private individuals to file lawsuits themselves — and they do, in great numbers. TCPA class action filings were up nearly 95% year-over-year through mid-2025, driven in part by increased plaintiff awareness, the growth of specialist plaintiff law firms, and the implementation of new consent rules that opened previously seemingly compliant programs up to new liability.
Important enforcement characteristics to know:
The CTIA Messaging Principles and Best Practices aren’t law, but if you don’t follow them, your carriers will filter or block your messages, which is a regulatory penalty in practice. The latest version was issued in October 2025.
The CTIA framework covers:
These standards are used by carriers such as AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile to determine whether or not to deliver your traffic. A message can be TCPA-compliant and still be blocked if it violates CTIA content or formatting standards. We need to look at the two compliance layers simultaneously.
For multi-state businesses, one of the biggest pieces of SMS regulation news right now is the expansion of state-level consumer protection laws. A dozen or so states have passed SMS laws of their own, many of which are more restrictive than the federal TCPA. If the law of the state is more restrictive, the state law will preclude federal law for contacts within that state.
| State | Important Requirement(s) | Effective |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Added SMS to the scope of the DTPA (Deceptive Trade Practices Act); new private right of action under the DTPA | September 2025 |
| Virginia | Opt-out records must be kept for 10 years | January 2026 |
| Florida | 15-day safe harbor after opt-out request; maximum of 3 messages per recipient per 24-hour period | Updated 2024 |
| Connecticut | Requires written consent for all telephonic sales; penalties up to $20,000 per violation | In effect |
| Arizona | Bans unsolicited texts to DNC-registered numbers; fines up to $1,000 per violation | In effect |
| Oklahoma | Prohibits use of automatic dialing systems without prior consent; mirrors TCP A consent framework at state level | In effect |
| Washington | Consumer Protection Act applies to SMS solicitations; there is no “established business relationship” exemption for residential contacts | Active |
The TCPA has two different standards of consent depending on the type of message:
Required for all marketing and promotional messages. That is
Fit for transactional and informational messages, when the consumer has provided their phone number in a context that directly relates to the communication — for example, a customer providing their number at checkout, and then later receiving shipping updates on their order.
In all cases, the consumer must take an affirmative step, the consent must be specific to the sending entity, and the record must be stored and retrievable. Accepted methods are:
Under the FCC’s January 2026 rule, any consent obtained from a comparison shopping site, lead generation platform, or third-party intermediary can only be used by the specific brand clearly identified at the time of opt-in. If your SMS contact database was created using shared leads, co-registration programs, or purchased lists, it should be reviewed immediately from a legal perspective and will most likely need to be re-consented to be used for marketing.
These are primarily commercial messages for advertising, promotion, or selling—such as discount offers, product announcements, event invitations, loyalty program updates, etc. They shall be subject to prior express written consent and shall include:
Example marketing message in compliance:
[BrandName] Your exclusive 20% off code is SAVE20. Expires Sunday. Reply STOP to opt-out. Message and data rates may apply.
These messages include information directly related to an existing relationship or transaction, such as order confirmations, delivery updates, appointment reminders, account alerts, two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, and similar. They require a lower bar for consent, but there’s one big caveat: No promotional materials.
If you add a discount, upsell, or any promotional element to a transactional message, it becomes a marketing message, and the higher consent standard applies. Your platform configuration must have transactional and promotional workflows completely separate.
Conforming transactional message:
[BrandName]: Good news! Your order #48291 is on its way and estimated to arrive Thursday. Track your order: [link]
Transactional message that does not comply (reclassified as marketing):
[BrandName]: Your order #48291 has shipped. Use code NEXT10 for 10% off your next purchase while you wait.
In the US, any business sending A2P (application-to-person) SMS messages using 10-digit long codes (10DLC) must register with The Campaign Registry (TCR). All the major carriers are blocking unregistered traffic since February 2025. This is not a phased rollout or a soft enforcement period—unregistered messages are not delivered.
Registration is a two-part process:
Registers your business entity. You will need:
Logs every single use case (e.g., marketing, alerts, 2FA, customer care). Each campaign needs:
Approval times: It normally takes 1–3 business days to register a brand. A normal registration time for a campaign is 2–7 business days, but more complex use cases may take longer.
Some industries aren’t able to register for 10DLC, and some can’t use long codes for A2P SMS at all. These include cannabis, certain categories of gun dealers, payday loans, short-term high-interest lending, and debt relief services. Those in these industries need to think about short codes or toll-free numbers with the right use-case vetting.
The CTIA prohibits or restricts five types of content in A2P SMS campaigns, collectively known as SHAFT, regardless of consent:
| Category | Rule |
|---|---|
| Sex | No explicit content for adults. If your content is age-restricted but is legal, you must age-gate it. |
| Hate | Content that incites violence or discrimination against any protected class is strictly prohibited. |
| Alcohol | OK if age verification is necessary and specific opt-in language is used indicating the recipient is of legal drinking age. |
| Firearms | Allowed solely within legal limits and with additional vetting of the carrier. |
| Tobacco and CBD | Prohibited. Age verification required. Further, CBD is at the discretion of the carrier. |
Regardless of what you do to be compliant, any campaign in a SHAFT category is subject to further review in the 10DLC campaign registration process and can be filtered by carriers.
Public link shorteners like Bitly and TinyURL are often linked to spam traffic and will reliably trip carrier filters. Use branded or dedicated short domains for any link in an SMS message, wherever possible. Carriers incorporate link reputation into their automated message scoring, and a flagged URL can cause filtering of otherwise compliant traffic.
In a February 2024 declaratory ruling, the FCC reaffirmed that AI-generated voices are “artificial voices” for purposes of the TCPA. The ruling covers voice calls, but the FCC has emphasized that the same consent and disclosure requirements for AI-generated or AI-assisted SMS content apply as they do to other types of automated messaging.
For companies using AI tools to:
… the same prior express written consent requirements apply. Not even AI is an exception. Make sure AI-assisted sends are included in your consent framework and 10DLC campaign registration just like traditional automated sends. Include a record in your compliance audit trail of what systems are creating or personalizing content.
| Type of Violation | Statutory Damages |
|---|---|
| Typical TCPA violation (per message) | $500 |
| Willful or knowing TCPA violation (per message) | $1,500 |
| DNC Registry violation (per text or call) | Up to $43,792 |
| Connecticut state violation (per violation) | Up to $20,000 |
| Arizona DNC violation (per text) | $1,000 |
No aggregate damages cap. If you don’t have the right consent, a campaign of 100,000 messages could result in liability of over $150 million in a class action situation.
| Requirement | Marketing SMS | Transactional SMS |
|---|---|---|
| Prior written consent | ? Required | ? Not required |
| Sender identification | Required | Required |
| Opt-out mechanism | ? Mandatory | ?? Recommended |
| Quiet hours (8 am–9 pm local) | Required | Required |
| 10DLC registration | Required | Required |
| DNC scrubbing | ? Required | ? Required |
| One-to-one consent (2026) | ? Required | N/A |
| No promotional content | N/A | ? Required |
MessageBlink is a native Salesforce SMS and WhatsApp platform built for teams that need compliant, high-volume messaging without leaving their CRM. Consent management, opt-out handling, and 10DLC campaign mapping — all inside Salesforce.https://www.messageblink.com/sms-regulation-news-2026-the-complete-guide/
Website: https://www.messageblink.com/